TECHNOLOGICAL MODERNIZATION AS THE BASIS FOR BUSINESS RESILIENCE

Nikita Lukovnikov

Authors

Nikita Lukovnikov Department of Economics and Industrial Management, Perm National Research Polytechnic University (RUSSIA)

Keywords:

business resilience, COVID-19, technological modernization, innovative development, new technologies, technology export

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to assess the results of scientific and technological activities of enterprises and organizations in Russia to create new technologies in the conditions of quarantine in 2020. The importance of the study is determined by the need to maintain a continuous cycle of technological modernization of production in order to preserve and increase the stability of business in the context of the global crisis, which was provoked by the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. The methods of bibliographic analysis, comparative analysis, methods of collecting and processing statistical data and the method of graphical presentation of data were used to carry out the analysis. Conclusions. As a result of the study it was revealed that in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and severe restrictions on most business processes, the activities of Russian enterprises and organizations in creating new production technologies not only did not decrease, but even increased.

References

. Mingaleva Zh.A. (2018). Creation of new advanced production technologies as the basis for sustainable development and technological security of the Russian economy. National interests: priorities and security 14, 12(369), pp.2195-2208.

. Rosstat. Technological development of economic sectors. Avaliable at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/11189 [accessed 09.04.2021].

. Kim H., Kwon Y.S. (2011). Determinants of External Technology Acquisition: Comparison across Sectors of Manufacturing Industry in Korea. IMECS 2011 - International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2, pp. 1281- 1284.

. Jones G.K., Lanctot A.Jr., Teegen H.J. (2001). Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition. J of Bus Vent 16(3), pp. 255-283. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00048-8

. Alcácer, J., Zhao, M. (2012). Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Manag Sc 58(4), pp. 734-753. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1451

. D’Agostino, L.M.D., Santangelo, G.D. (2012). Do overseas R&D laboratories in emerging markets contribute to home knowledge creation? An extension of the double diamond model. Manag Int Rev 52(2): 251–273.

. Mingaleva Zh. (2012). Structural modernization of economy and innovation development. World Appl Sc J 20(9), pp.1313-1316. DOI:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.20. 09.2887

. Novikova, I.V., Muraveva, N.N., Grazhdankina, L.Y., Zhelnakova, N.Y., Tronina, L.A. (2020). The Problems of Modernization of the Social and Economic Development in the Light of the Scientific and Technological Revolution. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 91, pp.219-228.

. Zharov, V., Zharov, N. (2021). Features of Structural Investment and Innovative Industrial Policy in the Regions of the North and the Arctic and Assessment of Prospects for Technological Modernization of Industrial Production. IOP Conf Series: Earth and Env Sc 666(6), 062071

Mingaleva, Z., Mirskikh, I. (2019). The problems of digital economy development in Russia. Adv in Intel Syst and Comp 850, 48-55 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02351-5_7

.Akberdina, V., Kalinina, A., Vlasov, A. (2018). Transformation stages of the Russian industrial complex in the context of economy digitization. Prob and Persp in Manag 16(4), pp. 201-211.

.Molodchik, A.V., Sevastianov, V.P. (2016). On the possibilities of self-financing of innovative programs of industrial enterprises. Bul of the Perm Sc Res Polyt Un. Socio-econ sc 1, pp. 62-77.

.Danilina H., Mingaleva Zh. (2013). Improving of Innovation Potential Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises. Middle East J of Sc Res 13б, pp.191-194. DOI:10.5829/idosi. mejsr.2013.13.sesh.1434

.Pogrebnyakov, N., Kristensen, J. (2011). Building innovation subsidiaries in emerging markets: The experience of Novo Nordisk. Res-Techn Manag 54 (4), pp.30–37.

.Reddy, P. (2010). Global innovation in emerging economies. NY, London: Routledge.

.UNCTAD. (2005). World investment report: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D. NY and Geneva: UNCTAD.

.Giroud, A., Ha, Y.J., Yamin, M. (2014). Foreign subsidiaries’ internal and external R&D cooperation in South Korea: Explanatory factors and interaction. Asian Bus & Manag 13(3), pp.227–256.

.Tseng, C.-H. (2011). Subsidiaries’ local linkage characteristics and R&D assignments in a small developing economy. Asian Bus & Manag 10 (2): 209– 232.

.Ivarsson I., Alvstam C.G. (2017). New technology development by Swedish MNEs in emerging markets: The role of co-location of R&D and production. Asian Bus and Manag 16 (1-2), pp. 92-116. DOI: 10.1057/s41291-016-0013-z